This man assumes, with neither evidence nor argument, that skepticism about global warming is unjustified and then seeks to explain why it exists. I await social-scientific studies that assume that skepticism about global warming is justified and then seek to explain why so many scientists are dogmatic.
Note the trend. Politically motivated "scientists" dogmatically assert something, then seek to explain why not everyone believes it. This is not science. It is politics masquerading as science.
Keith Burgess-Jackson, J.D., Ph.D. 