Re “A new way to tackle gun deaths” (Oct. 5) by Nicholas Kristof: In Britain we have what must be the most stringent gun controls in the world. Most handguns are banned. To purchase a firearm you must obtain approval from the local police and you need to notify them when you acquire or dispose of a firearm. Anyone with a history of mental health problems or with a criminal record is banned from holding a license. However, in the case of mental health, it is difficult to apply and has not always been properly applied. There are instances of appeals against a ban being upheld, with disastrous consequences.
Nevertheless, I do not know a single shooter who is against licensing. The problems for us arise in the unequal interpretation and operation of the system by different police authorities. I am fortunate, I come under London’s Metropolitan Police, which is swift and efficient in responding to requests to acquire a license (about six weeks), add a new firearm to a license (about one week), or to renew a five-year license (about six weeks). A neighboring police force is currently taking six to eight weeks to add a new firearm and up to 44 weeks to renew an existing license.
What is being proposed in America is mild compared with what we have, and it has taken Britain almost a century of increasing controls and only two public “massacres” to get here. You just need to make sure that those who control firearms are themselves controlled, and above all act fairly and not politically.
By the way, Britain’s firearms laws only affect legitimate shooters; they have done absolutely nothing to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals.
John Roper Woodford Green, England