Skip to content

Keith Burgess-Jackson, J.D., Ph.D.

  • Harry G. FrankfurtI categorically reject the presumption that egalitarianism, of whatever variety, is an ideal of any intrinsic moral importance. This emphatically does not mean that I am inclined generally to endorse or to be indifferent to prevailing inequalities, or that I oppose efforts to eliminate them. In fact, I support many such efforts. What leads me to support them, however, is not a conviction that equality of some kind is morally desirable for its own sake and that certain egalitarian goals are therefore inherently worthy. Rather, it is a more contingent and pragmatically grounded belief that in many circumstances greater equality of one sort or another would facilitate the pursuit of other socially desirable aims. So far as equality as such is concerned, I am convinced that it has no inherent or underived moral value at all.

    (Harry Frankfurt, "Equality and Respect," Social Research 64 [Spring 1997]: 3-15, at 3 [endnote omitted])

    Harry Frankfurt on Egalitarianism

    –––––––

    Apr 21
  • Point of Know Return (1977).

    Kansas, “Point of Know Return” (1977)

    –––––––

    Apr 21
  • Here.

    Ten Years Ago Today in This Blog

    –––––––

    Apr 21
  • Here.

    Dilbert

    –––––––

    Apr 21
  • See here. Do scientists not realize that, by entering the political fray, they undermine their authority? If they don't realize it, then they're oblivious to Keith's Law, which says that authoritativeness is inversely proportional to partisanship.

    The Politicization of Science

    –––––––

    Apr 21
  • Re “Comey should be honest about himself” by Joan Vennochi (Opinion, April 17): Erstwhile former FBI director James Comey has slipped into the slime that envelops Donald Trump. It is not a good look. It vitiates Comey’s narrative, weakens his case, and adds to the belief that appointive public service is little different from facing the electorate directly, leastways in the hems and haws one makes to cover for questionable actions.

    President Trump is at ease in this swamp, but Comey is manifestly unsuited for this degree of stink. Yet he chose it and cannot fault the president for covering him with rancid tweets. We deserve better.

    Paul Bloustein

    Cincinnati

    Note from KBJ: Have you ever seen such bad writing? Gawd.

    Trump Derangement Syndrome, from Today’s Boston Globe

    –––––––

    Apr 21
  • Just heard the Campaign was sued by the Obstructionist Democrats. This can be good news in that we will now counter for the DNC Server that they refused to give to the FBI, the Debbie Wasserman Schultz Servers and Documents held by the Pakistani mystery man and Clinton Emails.

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 20, 2018

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Presidential Tweet

    –––––––

    Apr 21
  • Here.

    Ten Years Ago Today in This Blog

    –––––––

    Apr 20
  • Here.

    Dilbert

    –––––––

    Apr 20
  • Sheer Heart Attack (1974).

    Queen, “Flick of the Wrist” (1974)

    –––––––

    Apr 20
Previous Page Next Page

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    Keith Burgess-Jackson, J.D., Ph.D.

    Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

  • Keith Burgess-Jackson, J.D., Ph.D.
    View site in Reader
    Manage subscriptionsSign upLog in
    Report this content
    Collapse this bar