Keith Burgess-Jackson, J.D., Ph.D.

Here is Ann Coulter's latest column.

I predicted Donald Trump's victory. I'm pleased and proud to have him as my president. For those of you who didn't support him and don't like him, go jump in a lake. America is being made great again.

Here.

Here.

Here are the 2017 Gold Glove winners.

I agree with this author. Facebook, Twitter, and Google are the functional equivalents of a town square.

Obsession (1978).

Here is my latest toy: an Apple iPad Pro with 512 gigabytes of storage space and a 12.9-inch screen. I used an iPad mini for almost five years. It became frustratingly slow. The iPad Pro is much faster.

You're a fool if you either believe what is reported by the mainstream media or rely on the mainstream media for your information. Read this. Anyone who observed Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign knew that she was seriously ill (and presumably still is), but only the most intrepid of reporters pointed it out. I continue to be amazed by the loyalty shown to the Clintons. Then again, perhaps it's fear rather than loyalty. Bad things happen to people who criticize the Clintons. Turning on them is like turning on a Mafia don.

The White House made two climate-related statements on Friday. Each statement alone was not very surprising, but delivered together they make an absurd message.

The first statement announced the release of the fourth National Climate Assessment. Like the assessment reports before it, this report repeats warnings about the serious consequences of climate change and makes the clearest case yet for taking bold action to mitigate greenhouse gases.

The second statement contradicts the assessment report by repeating the Trump administration's stance on climate change—that the climate has always changed and that they will continue to expand the use of fossil fuels. As an implied justification for ignoring the report's warnings, the White House went on to state that there is still "uncertainty" in the Earth's sensitivity to greenhouse gas emissions.

So the White House is telling us: There will likely be a global disaster ahead if we do not mitigate greenhouse gases, but we plan to do nothing—and even expand the release of greenhouse gases—because we think there's still a chance, however slim, that everything will turn out alright. Does anyone else feel as though you're at tea party with the Mad Hatter?

David Henry • St. Louis