To the Editor:
While I find some of the dialogue, particularly references to the Holocaust, vile, inappropriate and counterproductive, I do feel that comparing this Iran deal to the 1938 Munich Agreement signed by Neville Chamberlain, Adolf Hitler and other leaders to be completely appropriate.
This Iranian regime, by its own words and actions, is as dangerous and as antithetical to American interests as Nazi Germany. To support the signing of this suicidal agreement is to be willfully blind.
The ramifications for Israel, the Middle East and the United States are so dire that I do not believe it is inappropriate to question the intentions and priorities of those who negotiated it and support it.
The priorities of people like Representative Jerrold Nadler may be laudable and valid; however, they are not protecting the future of Israel or the world’s Jews.
It is not treason to put other priorities ahead of the survival of the Jewish nation. However, it is disingenuous to call yourself “pro-Israel” and then support the continuation of Iranian centrifuges, the limitations on Iranian nuclear inspections and the unleashing of billions of dollars of revenue to a nation that supports terrorist organizations whose stated goal is to destroy Israel.
As long as Mr. Nadler wants to wear the mantle of being pro-Israel, he deserves the criticism he receives.
J. D. REICH
Lakeland, Fla.
