The following three propositions are inconsistent, which means they can't all be true, which means the truth of any two of them entails the falsity of the third:
- Roy Moore is to be condemned for his behavior toward women.
- Al Franken is not to be condemned for his behavior toward women.
- There is no morally relevant difference between the behavior of Roy Moore and the behavior of Al Franken.
Which proposition do you reject? I haven't heard anyone reject 1. I have heard some leftists reject 2. I've even heard a leftist or two reject 3. If the allegations against Roy Moore are true, then I accept 1 and reject 2.
