I had two thoughts while reading this New York Times editorial opinion. First, has the editorial board written a similar opinion about animal-rights terrorists? If not, why not? Surely it's not because the board sympathizes with animal-rights terrorists. Or does it? Second, the board says that "abortion opponents should refrain from the 'baby killer' rhetoric that inflames an already heated debate." Why? Isn't abortion the killing of babies? Since when is accurate description inflammatory?
Abortion
–––––––
