Keith Burgess-Jackson, J.D., Ph.D.

Here.

Here.

In our desire to make sure that our children learn to "adjust" to their environment, we have given them insufficient opportunity to acquire the knowledge that will enable them to master their environment.

In our attempt to make education "fun," we have neglected the academic disciplines that develop sound minds and are conducive to sound characters.

Responding to the Deweyite attack on methods of teaching, we have encouraged the teaching profession to be more concerned with how a subject is taught than with what is taught. Most important of all: in our anxiety to "improve" the world and insure "progress" we have permitted our schools to become laboratories for social and economic change according to the predilections of the professional educators. We have forgotten that the proper function of the school is to transmit the cultural heritage of one generation to the next generation, and to so train the minds of the new generation as to make them capable of absorbing ancient learning and applying it to the problem of its own day.

The fundamental explanation of this distortion of values is that we have forgotten that purpose of education. Or better: we have forgotten for whom education is intended. The function of our schools is not to educate, or elevate, society; but rather to educate individuals and to equip them with the knowledge that will enable them to take care of society's needs. We have forgotten that a society progresses only to the extent that it produces leaders that are capable of guiding and inspiring progress. And we cannot develop such leaders unless our standards of education are geared to excellence instead of mediocrity. We must give full rein to individual talents, and we must encourage our schools to enforce the academic disciplines—to put preponderant emphasis on English, mathematics, history, literature, foreign languages and the natural sciences. We should look upon our schools—not as a place to train the "whole character" of the child—a responsibility that properly belongs to his family and church—but to train his mind.

(Barry M. Goldwater, The Conscience of a Conservative, ed. CC Goldwater, The James Madison Library in American Politics, ed. Sean Wilentz [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007 (first published in 1960)], 78-80 [italics in original])

Not Fragile (1974).

Here is Kurt Schlichter’s latest column.

In her column “I’m engaged in an evil enterprise with every click, and I can’t stop” (Opinion, Dec. 3), Margery Eagan equates our participation in less-than-scrupulous commercial empires (Amazon, Facebook, Apple) with Donald Trump’s moral and ethical digressions. Hardly.

We can easily choose to shop locally, unplug from social media, or keep the same phone for a few years, without having undone decades of progress on multiple social and environmental fronts, endangering vulnerable populations, or destroying relationships across the globe.

It is imperative that citizens, and particularly fine journalists like Eagan, continue to question and challenge reckless power despite our own shortcomings.

Bill Boehm

Cambridge

The Trump Administration has accomplished more than any other U.S. Administration in its first two (not even) years of existence, & we are having a great time doing it! All of this despite the Fake News Media, which has gone totally out of its mind-truly the Enemy of the People!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 9, 2018

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Here.